🔗 Share this article

Based on a recent review, scores of individuals with histories in the fossil fuel field have been placed within the existing administration, featuring more than 40 who formerly served personally for coal firms.

Background of the Analysis

The report examined the histories of appointees and personnel working in the executive branch and eight government offices overseeing energy matters. These encompass key entities such as the EPA, the Department of the Interior, and the Energy Department.

Wider Regulatory Context

The review comes amid ongoing efforts to roll back environmental rules and renewable energy incentives. As an example, recent acts have opened large sections of federal territory for extraction and eliminated backing for clean sources.

With the barrage of negative actions that have happened on the environment side... it’s crucial to inform the citizens that these aren’t just steps from the vague, huge thing that is the administration broadly, said a analyst involved in the study. They are often specific players with ties to certain powerful groups that are carrying out this harmful deregulatory agenda.

Significant Findings

Researchers discovered 111 staff whom they considered as energy sector veterans and clean energy critics. This includes 43 people who were personally working by coal firms. Included in them are high-profile senior executives such as the head of energy, who formerly acted as chief executive of a hydraulic fracturing firm.

This group also contains less prominent government personnel. For example, the division responsible for renewable energy is led by a previous oil executive. Similarly, a top energy advisor in the White House has held high-ranking jobs at prominent oil companies.

Other Connections

An additional 12 personnel possess connections to energy-financed libertarian research groups. Those encompass former members and fellows of organizations that have strongly opposed clean power and promoted the use of traditional energy.

Additionally 29 additional appointees are previous corporate managers from polluting fields whose business interests are intimately connected to energy resources. Additional personnel have connections with power providers that sell traditional energy or elected representatives who have advocated pro-oil agendas.

Agency Emphasis

Investigators identified that 32 personnel at the Department of the Interior individually have ties to polluting industries, rendering it the most influenced government agency. That includes the leader of the agency, who has consistently accepted oil donations and functioned as a link between fossil fuel sector donors and the administration.

Political Contributions

Fossil fuel donors provided sizable funds to the presidential initiative and swearing-in. Since entering the White House, the administration has not only enacted industry-friendly regulations but also created benefits and tariff carveouts that benefit the sector.

Expertise Questions

In addition to oil-tied candidates, the researchers noted several government higher-ups who were appointed to key positions with minimal or no pertinent knowledge.

These people may not be linked to fossil fuels so closely, but their unfamiliarity is dangerous, stated one co-author. It’s reasonable to think they will be easily influenced, or vulnerable targets, for the fossil fuel objectives.

As an example, the appointee to lead the environmental agency’s office of chief legal officer has minimal litigation history, having not ever handled a legal matter to resolution, nor conducted a testimony, and nor presented a court petition.

During a separate case, a executive aide working on energy policy moved to the job after working in positions unrelated to energy, with no apparent specific energy industry or regulatory expertise.

Administration Statement

One official for the executive branch dismissed the report, saying that the administration’s personnel are highly qualified to implement on the public’s mandate to expand American fuel development.

Previous and Current Context

The leadership enacted a significant array of pro-industry actions during its initial term. In its second period, prepared with pro-business agendas, it has spearheaded a considerably wider and more aggressive crackdown on ecological regulations and clean power.

There is no shame, said one researcher. They are willing and ready to go out there and tout the fact that they are executing favors for the energy sector, extractive industry, the energy sector.